Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Lecture nine: Money Makes the World Go Round

  1. If a dead-tree medium falls in the forest... can it become a nurse log?
  2. Can blogging pay in the era of freeconomics?
  3. Amazon and other affiliates
  4. How pay-per-click works
  5. Display adverts and providers
  6. Newsletters role in the blogosphere. Poindexterish?
  7. Micropatronage and blog sponsorship
  8. Merchandise me!
  9. The cruel truth about exposure
  10. More, I want to know MORE about monetization
  11. Your mission, week nine

Assignment: Add one or more of the following: Google AdSense, a widget, blogroll, a "best of" panel or labels. Monitor statistics, especially referrals, from last week's community outreach, then report on your findings.

Feedback: (Mike) Q&A, tech troubleshooting

If a dead-tree medium falls in the forest... can it become a nurse log?

The media's abuzz about the death of tangible media. Recently casualties include Gourmet, Modern Bride, National Geographic Adventure, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer and The Rocky Mountain News. The Christian Science Monitor became America's first nationally circulated paper to move entirely online. Magazines like PC and Playgirl have done the same, digital migration.

In 2009, 428 titles closed, compared with 618 in 2008 and 643 in 2007. The good news? The rate of decay is slowing. But new efforts are down from 335 in '08, according to Mediafinder.

“Despite the difficult year for the magazine industry, more than 275 magazines launched in 2009 – showing there is still strength in the regional, health, and food categories, with Food Network Magazine reporting more than 1 million readers,” explained Trish Hagood, President of Oxbridge Communications, publishers of MediaFinder.

Some of this turbulence is good, as Steve Rubel, Director of Insights for Edelman Digital, pointed out on Micropersuasion.com in November 08. "We're moving fast toward becoming a society that consumes media entirely in digital format. Part of it is environmental, but a lot of it is because of broadband and connected devices. Now of course it will take a long long time for this to become a global phenomenon. But in the US at least, the pace has picked up a lot just in the last few months."

The buzzword here is "media green" ... and the trend's advantages are obvious. But now the debate centers around how to keep content-creators fed, both long-term professionals and "citizen publishers" stepping up to the plate like us.

The answer may well lie in technology from smartphone apps to electronic ink, which prevents the eye strain often provoked by backlit displays. Even in bright sunlight, e-ink pages resemble those of a paperback.

Products like Sony's Reader, Amazon's Kindle and Barnes & Noble's Nook allow folks to download books, blogs, magazines and newspapers onto a wireless device. Portable, the 1/3-inch-thick Kindle is often called the last digital great hope: even Oprah's a fan. The idea's pretty basic: make it easy for users to pay for quality content and, a la iPod, they just might. But Amazon employs a proprietary format: Digital Rights Management (DRM) issues diminish the Kindle's appeal for many. Here tech-writer Yardena Arar reviews the best e-book readers in a 2009 PC World article.

In another article, the author notes that emerging technologies will soon blend color and video into such devices, along with more swiftness and sturdiness.

In early April 2010, Apple launches its much-heralded tablet computer, the 1.5-lb iPad, weighing in from $499. Here two experts debate whether this medium will save publishing. Hopefully, as Tony Bradley, co-author of Unified Communications for Dummies, points out in another article: "Traditional media – whether books, magazines, newspapers, music, or movies – stillneed to grasp the digital landscape, and the changes that it brings for the economic models they have built their businesses on for decades. Somewhere out there is a revenue structure that creates a win-win-win for the publishers, the platforms (like the iPad and the Kindle), and the customers."

Electronic paper could take this a step further, introducing flexible, scrunchable displays. I have high hopes that bigger canvases will encourage some of print media's "eye candy" elements – like strong photography and design – to migrate into cyberspace.

The web's future is uncertain, but with that instability, brings much excitement. Check out this great article for an overview of where this all could lead.

Can blogging pay in the era of freeconomics?

As we noted in earlier posts, blogging can pay, even in a freeconomics climate.

Yummy, Freeconomics. Will I get rich quick?
Probably not, unless you start working full-time on a niche blog and studying SEO in depth.

Slate magazine's Blogging for Dollars dug into Technorati's 2008 State of the Blogosphere report and revealed that sites "with 100,000 or more unique visitors a month earn an average of $75,000 annually—though that figure is skewed by the small percentage of blogs that make more than $200,000 a year. The estimates from a 2007 Business Week article are older but juicier: The LOLcat empire rakes in $5,600 per month; Overheard in New York gets $8,100 per month; and Perez Hilton, gossip king, scoops up $111,000 per month."

Before you dash off, Gold-Rush-style, heed Slate's warning: "Once a blog hobbyist goes pro, he or she faces a daily pressure to churn out new material. In the wrong mind, that can lead to top-10 lists, recycled ideas, half-baked notions, lots of viral videos, and a general increase in information pollution."

I'm with usability expert Jakob Nielsen on this. "Avoid quickly written, shallow postings. Instead, invest your time in thorough, value-added content that attracts paying customers."

Mike and I both find affiliate programs, like Amazon Associates, to pay off quickest for "dabbling" bloggers.

Amazon and other affiliates

Recommend stuff, get paid: the idea's so simple, so very ... viral. Yet pound for pound, Amazon Associates may be the quickest way to see financial results for your blogging efforts.

The drill? You name-drop books, DVD's, garden implements and novelty mustard kits: whatever floats your boat and is available in the Ur-Warehouse. Amazon gives you a unique code, which attributes the referral to your account. Then it kicks back a thin slice, 4-10% of any profit, via gift certificates if you prefer.

Yes, it's all very "company store" ... but as someone who runs up a big media tab each year, I won't complain much about those frequent $25 gift certificates.

Amazon recently revamped its system, so associates have a top-page nav bar that can "link to this product," among other neato tricks. Users can chose between text and image, image only and text only, adjusting colors to suit a template. I'm still wary of its text links, which embed all types of lame-o spacing into the mix. Instead I look at the autogenerated HTML code, pick out the "http://blah" bit, then paste that into my WYSIWYG program. Like this.

The class blog features an Amazon widget, right-hand side. Graphic- and link-rich, these ads are customized – you handpick each element – and quite productive. A determined person could gain ground quickly here.

How pay-per-click works

As Chris Anderson points out in Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business, "Thanks to Google, we now have a handy way to convert from reputation (PageRank) to attention (traffic) to money (ads). Anything you can consistently convert to cash is a form of currency itself, and Google plays the role of central banker for these new economies."

Google Adsense places commercial notices on your site – ideally ones tailored to your content, hence the label "targeted ads". You receive micropayments for readers (CPM – cost per thousand impressions: the "M" is the Roman numeral) and more if they take action (CPC – cost per click).

Sometimes Google gets it all wrong. Road Remedies', for example, veers off on alopecia cures every time I blog about beehives or hair, due to title ambiguity. When I've shifted the subject from Seattle to Palau, the front-page ads don't quite caught up and still advertise Seattle Singles, Condo/Lofts and Puppy Housebreaking for a few days. Recently I clocked a creepy ad for "Dr Oz Resveratrol". Should that turn out to be BS snake oil, I'll blacklist the site. AdSense allows publishers can block certain URLs, set content filters and chose default ads.

Note that I didn't follow-through my own Google Ad there ... I could be liable for click fraud, if I did. So I cut and paste possibly offensive addresses, then decide how grumpy I am about them.

Searching on"ResV" reveals it claims anti-aging, weight-loss and antioxidant abilities (yup: snake oil – nailed that in one). I'm dubious and reckon most of my readers would be too, if they gave a fig about such things. But unless something's actively aggravating – like adverts from the local cult church that suppresses women – I generally won't A. notice or B. take action. Life's too short to crack-down on every cellulite-burning scam...

Politics aside, Adsense let's you rock the fashion with custom color scheme and freedom to decide where adverts go (so liberating for "dead tree" media types!): banner, sidebar, even live-linked into your text. Google has an excellent tutorial on placement, which I won't attempt to nutshell: just read it.

The amount you earn varies, based on how much advertisers are bidding for certain keywords (check out Google AdWords, if you're curious about this process). Certain types of blogs see the best results, like those focused on products, hobbies or niches. Take another look at the best paid blogger list: most are tech, marketing and self-help gurus, except for Sharon Maguire's site. Cleanly integrated ads led dogbreedinfo.com to earn $650 per day. She talks technique here.

A journal-style blog, like RR, that meanders over many topics won't quickly rake in major cash (in fact, Google makes you wait until the $100 mark before cutting the first check, annoyingly). But with enough promotion and dedication, even a diarist can turn a profit.

Display adverts and providers

Tired of the G-domination? Duck around the mighty Google machine by selling ads directly (let's fact it: a TON of work) or allowing another company do the heavy lifting.

A display advert is, well, a big, pretty graphic one, as opposed to the "listing" style familiar from classified. Adsense lets you select either style (or both).

A few middle-man options:

*AdBrite serves nearly one billion pages daily, placing top brands like GM, Verizon and AT&T. Multimedia formats can take advantage of photos and video clips.

*BlogAds, a pioneer in the field, matches advertisers and bloggers. Small companies or individuals can choose your site, then you can agree or pass, depending on your convictions. Here, you can see how that works with wonderful transparency. Of course, we're talking about a range from a $18,000 top-right space in Perezhilton.com, a sport high on the bell curve's end, to a $20 spot in CrochetDude.

*Commission Junction can pipe in ads from HP, Expedia, Yahoo, Dell , Staples, Home Deport and other heavyweights. Each publisher – blogger in this case – receives an EPC rating (earnings per 100 clicks). This shows how effectively they translate leads into sales.

Linkshare and Clickbank are two other options worth exploring.

You'll also see the term "conversion rate" bandied about: again, this measures the percentage of visitors who take a desire action, like a purchase, filling in a form or dancing like a funky hamster.

OK, I made the last one up. But you try writing about "freeconomics" all day without your brain leaking out your nose...

Can I use AdSense and another service?
Yes. You're the boss, remember? Next question.

What if someone approaches me about a bespoke ad?
You can insert code via Settings>Page Elements>Add a Gadget>hml/javascript. But remember to consider the whole process, when setting your fee. You need to act as a designer, fitting the advert to your layout; as an accountant, issuing the invoice and chasing it, if necessary; as a content manager, taking down/refreshing the ad, according to the contract, and finally as a webmaster, monitoring statistics upon it, should the company request this intel. Products like AdReady can centralize much of that process.

For the self-sufficient, sometimes an offer can simply be too small. A company recently approached the Greece, A Love Story site about an inch-square $30/year advert. That pays for about a half-hour of my time. As it would take longer to publish and collect the cash, I demurred. Especially as the book is co-authored and shared income, like award cash, typically donated to charities...

But I'd rather have ads *I designed* on the site than generic ones. I want to build sponsor links directly!
Hard-core DIY! Check out these links on designing good online display ads and banners, which advocate:

Newsletters role in the blogosphere. Poindexterish?

Ever popular as a marketing tool, newsletters have migrated to blogging. Personally I'm lukewarm on all this – my inbox is clogged enough. The only time I enthusiastically welcome any sort of newsletter is a listserv digest, which compresses a day's worth of posts into one, quickly scannable block.

But some folks here have businesses and charities, which benefit from a monthly or seasonal communiqué. In that case, I recommend this subscription widget. And tips by my travel- and new-media colleague Karen Kefauver, who explores good newsletter craftsmanship, including the KISS rule (Keep it Short, Simple). She also has savvy advice about Facebook and Twitter protocol for companies. Kefauver mainly teaches in California's Bay Area and via teleseminar: I recommend her highly (see her social-media class offerings).

Finally, consider cross-posting your content, noting the newsletter's release and key topics on sites like Twitter, Facebook and Linked-In.

Micropatronage and blog sponsorship

Online money conduits like Paypal allow readers to make small donations to authors. Blogger Jason Kottke coined the term "micropatronage," when he spent 2005 blogging full-time, living off the largesse of his audience.

As Blogging for Dollars reveals, he "quit his job to blog full-time and asked his readers to become 'micropatrons' at a suggested rate of $30. He received $39,900 from 1,450 people but abandoned the experiment after a year. Kottke is vague about the reasons why he swore off micropatronage, but he suggests that he was worried that people wouldn't donate year after year. In order to build a bigger audience and potential new donors, he would have had to do some of the cheesy things to drive traffic (i.e., "Top Five Best" posts) and/or become a cult of personality (overshare, start flame wars, social network relentlessly). These days, he accepts ads as part of the Deck network."

A handful of bloggers have found sponsorship deals with larger outlets. Sometimes that's an endorsed feature like Craig Romano cross-posting a hike a week on WeatherChannel.com. I worked on a Diet-Coke-branded MSN site in 2008 that mixed text with short film clips of presenters, whom the snarkosphere dubbed "video puppets". Our budget derived from the advertising end and, in fact, my editor worked at a marketing company: an odd mishmash of intentions we'll probably see more and more (MSN Daily Access ceased publication after nine months or so).

Other times sponsorship's an outright "this post was brought to you by Brand X" entry-label. As an old-school journo, I'm pretty uncomfortable with "advertorials" unless they're distinctly labeled. And the government – in the US, at least – may soon require better labeling. But in the meantime, you're da boss. Do what suits!

For charitable endeavors, turn to fundraising platforms like Kickstarter, which showcases "backer rewards" and easily processes donations via Amazon accounts. My friend, travel writer Charyn Pfeuffer, just raised $20, 518, so she could voluntour in 12 countries. Thank-you treats ranged from homemade Theo chocolate bread to 40% off three nights at the Royal Hawaiian. Pfeuffer now can trade her Blackberry for a backpack, volunteering and publicizing programs around the world. Not only will her adventures give something back to cultures she routinely covers, but she now has a powerful social-network to broadcast her findings. It's a fantastic experiment in voluntourism and grassroots media funding.

Merchandise me!

Once a brand's established, bloggers can start with the spin-off merchandising, just like a blockbuster or Pixar hit. Companies like CafePress blaze your logo or slogans onto everything from mugs to hoodies to light-switch covers – all created on demand.

The cruel truth about exposure

Hating all the business end of this? Opt out with a "conglomerate" like Gawker, a network that includes Wonkette and Gizmodo, or Weblogs Inc, specializing in tech, media and science. On a more relaxed end of the spectrum – not requiring 10 to 12 posts a day – are profit-sharing schemes like Examiner.com and Today.com, which feature a range of unedited bloggers under one banner.

Once the companies have taken their cuts of Google Adsense and other revenue streams, writers rarely see more than pennies. And clips from outlets like that can hinder a professional-hopeful more than help... An emerging author is better off posting on her own site or volunteering for a reputable webzine.

Still, any way you slice it, the deal's better than "reader blogs" currently offered by companies like p-i.com and the revered blog-giant Huffington Post, which hog all the income with honeyed promises of "exposure" in return.

As wags put it, "why would I want exposure? People die from exposure". You want to meet the bills each month. Find a network that's on the ball about tech support, promotion and search engine optimization. Otherwise you might as well remain a one-man band...

Screenwriter Harlan Ellis rants memorably about all this on a preview of the documentary Dreams with Sharp Teeth. "You gotta pay me ... By what right would you call me and ask me to work for nothing? Do you get a paycheck? Does your boss get a paycheck? Do you pay the Telecity guy? Do you pay the cameraman? Do you pay the cutters? Do you pay the teamsters when they schlep your stuff on the trucks? Would you go to the gas station and ask for free gas? Would you go to the doctors and ask them to take out your spleen for nothing? How dare you call me and ask me to work for free?"

Publicity was the answer. And, as Ellis points out, that has little value. How many DVD viewers will enjoy his interview, then seek out and purchase one of his books? "I should do a freebie for Warner Brothers? What, is Warner Brothers out with an eye-patch and a tin cup on the street? Fuck no!

"I sell my soul, but at the highest rates."

 

More, I want to know MORE about monetization

Time to hit the web, kiddies! We're here to give you a foundation and tools to grow with, not a bachelors degree in new media.

I recommend starting with Daryl Rouse's great ProBlogger article.

Your mission, week nine

Assignment: Add one or more of the following: Google AdSense, a widget, blogroll, a "best of" panel or labels. Monitor statistics, especially referrals, from last week's community outreach, then report on your findings. Feedback: (Mike) Q&A, tech troubleshooting

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Week 8: Photo finesse and advanced geekery

  1. Beyond snapshots: let your art tell a story
  2. Ten composition tips for blog photos
  3. Images as derivative works
  4. The Mona Lisa with a Mustache
  5. Permission to publish: the photo release
  6. Cameras: from your cell phone to a pro SLR
  7. Tinkering with images: software and ethics
  8. Web-friendly image formats and compression
  9. Web-prepping images, a review
  10. Image placement for ace design
  11. Art alignment and text-wraps
  12. Do I need a domain?
  13. Know your Frenemy
  14. Is dot.com da bomb?
  15. Your mission, week eight

Tips and Tricks (to come)

  1. Creating a three-column or custom template
  2. Deconstructing a URL
  3. Wrangling Google Analytics

Assignment: Comment on at least five newly discovered blogs and respond to all feedback left on your site. Make at least two posts, one with an image, the other with a video

Feedback: (Amanda) holistic critique

Beyond snapshots: let your art tell a story

Proper photography demands a large amount of specialized knowledge, expensive and heavy equipment, and chutzpah (can you bribe an amputee beggar in Delhi? Approach fierce fur-swathed babushka in Moscow? A Buddhist monk?). “Hone your photographic skills until they become second nature,” wrote Susan McCartney, author of Travel Photography: A Complete Guide to Shoot and Sell. This permits concentration on “the important things, which are aesthetics and logistics.”

Yet she acknowledged that almost anyone “with luck” could take the odd brilliant picture or two. And fortune flows easier and easier, thanks to technology. Thus any intelligent and dedicated blogger can produce original images to accompany their text. Granted, the photographs may not be Ansel Adams or Walker Evans quality, but even a functional snap adds color, texture and context (a picture's worth 1,000 words...).

Photojournalism, called "reportage photography" in Europe, pushes beyond snapshots and illustrations. An image – or carefully-chosen series – tells a story about a place and its people. Interpret the scenes, don't just photocopy Uluru or Angkor Wat. Make the tale compelling; the viewer has no obligation to examine the photo (or proceed on to the headline, captions and … finally … to the blog text itself).

Here's the difference: a hiking tour company wins an award. The jaded hack photographer herds the employees together with their plaque, producing a hideous “grip and grin” shot. A dynamic photojournalist shoots them camping by a lake or cresting a mountain in full outdoor regalia. She's gone to more trouble, but the active image captures the essence of the company, rather than a tired lineup.

Try to think like a photojournalist. Vary your images – horizontal and vertical, interesting crops – so that six or seven could be used on a spread. Take overview shots that set the scene, workplaces, landmarks, food bazaars, houses and signs and flags. Capture groups of locals, faces close-up (or other details, like hands, feet or one aspect of ceremonial costume), piles of souvenirs and plates of food. Consider how the images work together. What do they convey?

Sunsets, small furry animals and postcard views aren't the goal, stressed David Hurn in On Being a Photographer. “Most great photographs displaying beauty reveal a sensation of strangeness, not predictability … They are the opposite of clichés; they have a quality beyond the visually obvious.”

Such storytelling often involves contrast. This stretches far beyond light and shadow, however. Look for contextual friction, which adds emotional depth. For example, shoot a solemn person's portrait with gregarious diners behind. The bubbly background adds information: the subject is withdrawn even in a boisterous environment. Similarly, some of the most poignant developing-world illustrations may not depict poverty per se, but of the persistence of human spirit despite it, like a child building a rope swing in a refuge camp. Link the familiar and unfamiliar to help viewers connect.

As in writing, seek the universal theme. Can you evoke an emotion – nostalgia, awe or tenderness – from a single image or series? A well-composed photograph captures a time and place, conveying a message. You don't illustrate a story, you tell it, Peter Turnley once urged his colleagues. This photojournalist – with 40 Newsweek covers to his credit – sees his mission as even larger: “an on-going photographic expression of the key moments of history and a humanistic view of the 'Family of Man'”.

Such craft requires talent and honed skills (in Outliers, science writer Malcolm Gladwell suggests it takes 10,000 hours to reach "genius" mastery...). Be patient with yourself. Even National Geographic photographers take 2,000 images for each image printed. Bloggers rarely have the time to amass such a stockpile. But permit yourself a margin of error, say a 1:10 ratio of published images to discards. The ironclad rule here is: Snap a lot. Don't hold back, don't skimp. You may never return to that place, retry that activity or recapture that moment.

Ten composition tips for blog photos

Reams of books have been written on the subtle art of photography, which can't possibly be summarized in one lecture. However, here are ten simple steps for improving images.

1. Get close. Then get closer.
Strong, bold images catch the eye, so charge right in the middle of the action. The traditional advice is “go as close as you dare, then advance three more feet”. Portraits especially benefit from this intimate approach. What's more striking: a snapshot of granny on the couch with her dog, the molting Christmas tree and a tepid cup of tea – or a full frame of her noble, wrinkled face?

Shy shooters fret over the “invasion of space”, especially when the language barrier makes explanation impossible. Politely ask anyway, advised McCartney, who often talks and photographs for half an hour before reaching her favorite setup: three or four feet away with a 28mm lens. Approach cautiously and monitor the subject's expressions, gestures and posture.

“Approach slowly, as though they were small frightened animals (which most of us are, deep inside),” she joked. The camera can erode inhibitions on both sides. “It's rather like wearing a mask – and with the camera's protection you can approach, talk to and photograph most people quite easily.”

As war photographer Robert Capa famously put it: “If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough.” He followed this advice to the end: the 40-year-old stepped on a land mine while covering the French Indochina War in 1954. So get close, but tread softly and safely.

“Open the other eye occasionally,” recommended Photographer and Visual Storytelling Instructor Marcus Donner. “Maybe you're missing some interesting element … or maybe you're about to be whacked with a croquet ball. Don't let the camera give you a false sense of invulnerability.”

2. Dominant element
Your photo should clearly be about something. Direct the observer's eye – and don't distract them with too much clutter (like the poodle and the gift wrap). A useful trick here is the “rule of thirds”. Imagine a tic tac toe grid over an image. Good pictures have a “center of interest” where the lines meet.

When photographing people with objects, place the person in the extreme foreground, the thing far in the background (this works well with large objects, like St. Peter's and the Washington Monument. Otherwise you wind up with a camel driver against a biscuit-colored wall, instead of a camel driver with the Sphinx). Add even more depth with a relevant or interesting element in the middle ground too. Make the viewer's eye move in the frame, transforming a two-dimensional object into a three dimensional-one.

Landscapes pose a particular problem, according to Michael Busselle, author of Travel and Vacation Photography and fellow of the Royal Photographic Society. “There is often a temptation to include too much in the frame,” he observed. The image “has no immediate focus of attention and too many conflicting details.”


3. Prime time
Early morning and early evening light are warmer (the syrupy gold hue before sunset is nicknamed the “magic hour”, much exploited by catalogue designers). Looking at a magnificent sunset? Without filters, the splendor is hard to capture. But spin around; all that gorgeous light may illuminate a more intriguing scene.

Avoid shooting at midday, when the sun throws harsh shadows. Eye sockets, in particular, recede into gothic gloom. The human brow really serves a purpose: it shades the eye. A fill flash softens the contrast. Slightly overcast days provide nice, soft tones for portraits (while landscape photographers gnash their teeth).

Take notice of the shadows in a composition. Is there a better time to return and try again? Ansel Adams was famous for stalking light, returning time and time again in different seasons, until the conditions optimized. Much of good photography is patience: composing a frame, then waiting for conditions to perfect (for the purple light of dusk, a flock of birds in a certain quadrant, for the hunter-gather to pry open the trap or the Indonesian washerwoman to collect the linens).

This time-consuming process can clash with a reporter's restless quest for information. National Geographic staffer Jodi Cobb recommends that teams touch base – say, be in the same country and region – but not dog each others' footsteps. Travel writers doing double duty should expect conflicted loyalties … and even compromised coverage at times, sad to say.


4. Work the angles
Search out unusual angles. Climb up a column and shoot down. Lie on the cobbles and shoot up. Tilt the camera. Vary your perspective to produce an unusual effect. Also, look for natural 'frames', which add depth and interest to an image. Try shooting through a doorway or an archway of branches. Place a palm-leaf umbrella in a corner, then photograph the sandy beach and surfline. Finally, compose with “leading lines”, elements that draw in the eye (like a woman standing on the center line of a road, along a fence line or atop a staircase).

5. Avoid posing
“Photo faces” make for poor images generally. The artificial stiffness doesn't convey the sense of scene (professionals call this unnatural look “camera-conscious”). Shoot real people doing real things. Put subjects at ease by chatting – or shoot them unaware with a telephoto lens. Another technique is to “blow film”: keep the shutter firing until they grow accustomed to the experience and relax. Digital technology makes this option more affordable now.

6. Pound the pavement
Remember those boots were made for walking. A common amateur mistake is monotony; dozens of shots where the people and backgrounds remain in the same ratio. Gathered together, the images are dull. Mix it up. Vary the distance between the subject and camera. Change lenses. Zoom in and out. No flashy technology? Wear down the shoe leather and simply walk closer to avoid visual redundancy.

7. Outside the box
Get one in the can, to borrow some Hollywood lingo. Take a middle-of-the-road, good-enough “safety shot”, then push for more risky, artistic compositions. The subject needn't be dead center in the frame – as long as it's still clearly the subject. A runner, for example, could race into the right side of a photograph, giving a sense of movement and speed. A portrait might emphasize someone's soulful eyes, by eliminating their hair and chin. Likewise, not all photographs need to be the classic rectangle shape. Crop images into squares, panoramic strips or thin columns.

8. Silhouettes
Play around with shapes, especially distinctive ones (a pregnant woman, a child in a cowboy hat, a man with an Afro). Place the shadowy figure against a bright background (a person standing in a doorway on a sunny day does the trick). Adjust the exposure for the light area.

 

9. Avoid distractions
Don't let unwanted elements destroy your images. Is a tree behind the shaman? That palm will sprout from his head in the photograph. Try to minimize signs, telephone wires, garbage cans and other clutter. Shooting from a higher or lower angle often hides the mess. Blurring the background helps too (on an SLR, limit the depth-of-field with a large aperture like f-2.8).

10. Bracket exposures
Fancier cameras allow the photographer to set the exposure. The light meter displays the optimum setting. Take a shot at the recommended f-stop, then one above and one below (some models have auto-bracketing now). And don't hesitate to take multiple pictures of the same scene. Professionals use a rapid-fire function – and easily blast through several rolls or hundreds of digital frames perfecting one image. If in doubt, underexposure is always preferable, as it richens the color slightly.

Images as derivative works

Watch where you aim the camera – or rather, where you upload those memories of little Gertrude squeezing her Jabba the Hut doll. Even a photograph of a temporary art installation in Italy or Paraguay could land you in trouble. Yes, you pushed the shutter and thus own the copyright on the image. But make sure no one else holds rights on a creative work within it: then you need permission.

Before you panic, check out Wikimedia's great breakdown. Down the page, its casebook walks you through various scenarios, from sculptures to cave paintings and souvenir replicas of the Venus de Milo.

US law – and most first-world nations' – permits artists and photographers to sell representations of structures permanently in the public view. Egypt, however, recently tried to copyright the Sphinx and Giza's pyramids in a move that sparked much hilarity. Even the bill's author – Ashraf El Ashmawi, legal consultant to the antiquities council – finally admitted he wouldn't take the global witch-hunt to a micro level. "If you have a small shop and your trade is very limited, I will not take money from you," he told National Geographic.

"But if you are a big company, like some of these Chinese companies that make a lot of money from the replicas of antiquities ... according to the law, I can take the fees."

Thanks, fella. I'm glad to know blogger Marie Javins won't be extradited for posting her obligatory sightseeing snaps...

Some areas, like Peleliu (one of Palau's 16 states), may try to levy a commercial photography license on anyone associated with the media, however vaguely. On my last trip there, I was presented with a surprise $50 permit, instead of the usual $3 day-visitor one. I explained I wasn't shooting art for my Sport Diver article – or, indeed, any other at that rate. I offered to leave my cameras in the government office even. The bureaucrat insisted all journalists had to pay, but couldn't accept my credit card on site (the island's pretty rough and ready). Would I swing by the office in Koror?

Like hell.

(I did make a deal with Des, my local guide, that he would email me if his company might be fined for this, then I'd pay the tab. So far, so good.)

Anyway, as a blogger, you may wish to fly under the radar in some areas to avoid these hassles. An official on a five-square-mile state like Peleliu (pop 700) may not understand the nuances of "diary-style blog" versus, say, shooting stock for Getty.

The Mona Lisa with a Mustache

Derivative works also stir up plenty of migraines among the geekerati. These are creations that include major, copyright-protected elements from another work.

Read here about a case lost by the artist Jeff Koons, who told artisans to transform a greeting card into four sculptures, which sold for $367,000. Unfortunately, he didn't gain permission from Photographer Art Rogers, who'd snapped the couple holding eight puppies.

So what does this mean for bloggers? Mainly be careful when compositing together illustrations – and vigilant when your material is thus remixed. Fair use allows you to write a Buffy the Vampire Slayer spoof and publish a collage of images ripped from newspapers, if you can find any these days ... The exemption also permits Google to run thumbnails of your images in its search engine, thanks to the Perfect 10 ruling. Judges deemed this "transformative because it provides an added benefit to the public, which was not previously available and might remain unavailable without the derivative or secondary use."

The most famous example of this is Marcel Duchamp's parody of the Mona Lisa. He added facial hair and the caption L.H.O.O.Q, also the work's title (it translates as "she has a hot tail"). He transformed a cult icon into an object of ridicule to critique the bourgeoisie.

For a something to be derivative and kosher, it must display originality of its own, containing sufficient new expression over and above the earlier work's. As Judge Pierre N. Leval noted in a landmark Harvard Law Review article: "Transformative uses may include criticizing the quoted work, exposing the character of the original author, proving a fact, or summarizing an idea argued in the original in order to defend or rebut it. They also may include parody, symbolism, aesthetic declarations, and innumerable other uses."

We'll talk more about piracy, copyright and protection week ten.

Permission to publish: the photo release

The green-light to use a person's image is called a “model release” or "photo release". Advertising gigs – and some editorial ones – often demand this paperwork and now some uber-careful bloggers are following suit. Especially those who hope to sell images to stock or microstock agencies.

Here's a very barebones example:

Date

Photographer's name

I give to ______________ the irrevocable right to use my name and any photographic or illustrative depiction of me in all forms and for all purposes associated with the publication or transmission of works, including advertising and promotion. I waive the right to inspect or approve the finished version(s) and any requirement for payment.

Name:
Address:
Phone:
Signature:
Guardian Signature for minors:

Sample forms – and translations – are available online from Getty, among other agencies.

Cameras: from your cell phone to a pro SLR

A point-and-shoot is a good place to start (most folks have one already). These standard snappers are small, light and simple to use with a built-in lens and flash. Though convenient, they have limited manual override. Even accomplished photographers carry point-and-shoots as back-up equipment. Highly portable, these “toys” can be easily thrown into a purse or satchel, for times when you don't want to risk theft or lug 30lbs of gear to a cocktail party. And under certain conditions, a discrete camera is key.

Professionals prefer 35mm rangefinders and SLRs, which let the user change lenses and adjust the exposure. These cameras are more complicated and generally bulkier. Most have full automatic settings though, so beginners shouldn't shy away from a serious purchase. Midway between disposable cameras and professional rigs lies the “prosumer” market (futurist Alvin Toffler coined this phrase in 1979, but lately it's grown popular among dedicated digi-dabblers who prefer high-quality, high-tech gear). A prosumer model can cost just a few hundred dollars more than a quality point-and-shoot, but takes far superior snaps. Select equipment to grow into, as your skills expand. Many writers shoot Canon's Digital Rebel and Nikon's D-90, which has some video capacity as well.

Quality optics matter most, so it's worth investing in reputable brands like Canon, Nikon or Leica, even for a point-and-shoot. Buy the best lenses possible; if you must skimp, opt for a cheap camera body. “Always go for good glass,” is the popular wisdom. Richard I'Anson stressed this heavily in Travel Photography: A Guide to Taking Better Pictures. “Lens quality determines image sharpness, color and the light-gathering capacity of the lens, which can determine how you shoot in various lighting conditions,” he wrote.

Examine the warranty carefully, especially if shopping abroad. Some companies won't honor repair contracts outside the country of purchase. Test-drive the technology before returning home and search for English-language manuals before any trouble arises.

A tripod is useful for longer exposures. Bloggers often prefer a lightweight, tabletop model with 15cm collapsible legs and Velcro straps (to cling to a tree, fence etc.). Another fine option is a Gorillapod, which stands upright or twines around supports. Many models also fit small HD video recorders, like the excellent, cigarette-pack-sized Flip Mino.

A cable-release lets you fire the shutter without touching – and possibly shaking – the camera. A self-timer propped on a stable object can work just as well, cutting down on luggage and paraphernalia.

Serious shooters should consider taking a class or working through a reputable book like Basic Photography by Michael Langford or the less comprehensive Teach Yourself Photography by Lee Frost. I'Anson's excellent and user-friendly Lonely Planet guide is also highly recommended.

On a more cheap-and-cheerful, field-reporting front, you can upload images and blog posts directly from a cell phone. Control this via Settings> Email & Mobile > Add mobile device. Google offers advice about mobile blogging here.

 

Twitter also supports photo uploads via its Twitpic, which also accepts images via its website. For instant-gratification photographers, iTookThisOnMyPhone offers good resources. It also has a Unified Uploader that merges photo accounts from various sites – Facebook, Twitpic, Picasa, Flickr, Shutterfly, YouTube, etc. – and can send a zip file to your desktop. Not only does this provide backup, but cross-platform accessibility, even when you're off-line.

Such immediacy is amazing. Snap it. Share it. But the downsides are myriad. Phone lenses often have focusing and color-balance issues (you can compensate somewhat with apps, but you're still dealing with a primitive device compared to a bespoke camera). And immediate uploads don't permit any cropping, retouching or manipulation.

As with any tool, deploy smartphone art under the right circumstances: when immediacy or ease take precedence over art.

In late 2009, the Consumer Electronics Association released a study of digital photographers, analyzing their six main patterns of behavior:

  • Frustrated Photogs (25 percent of the market)
  • Digital Curators (23 percent)
  • One-Click Wonders (15%)
  • Feature-Focused Photogs (16%)
  • Picture Happy Socialites (10%)
  • Digital Mavericks (10%).

Think about where you stand on that list and what you want to achieve. Then select your toys accordingly!

Tinkering with images: software and ethics

Mike has already detailed some Tools for Writing Posts. Following are few more software recommendations...

Photoshop remains the best program for electronic manipulation. It's sold as part of the the Creative Suite 4 family, alongside Flash, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and other goodies. But the price – $999 to $2,499 – can induce sticker shock, so many bloggers turn to its little sister: Adobe Photoshop Elements (free trial, US$139, often bundled). Two other favorites are Google's Picasa download (this dovetails with Blogger's web albums) and the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP).

This freely distributed piece of software is nifty for retouching, composition and image authoring (see this handy post about gimping a header and also notes about modification for Blogger's Minima template. This is the best option for folks who want to create a stylish banner and then not bother with photo-manipulating).

These programs offer deity-like power. Zit begone! Turn grey skies blue! Erase your ex from the family portrait! But give some thought to ethics. A photographer already interprets the world, choosing what to shoot and how to present it (via filters, lighting, focal planes, even special effects in programs like Photoshop, etc.). When does that subjective slice of reality become fiction, though?

Most professionals draw the line at distortions of the truth. Hard-core news shooters even include staged photos in that category. If they can't capture a moment as it unfolds, given the light and elements at hand, the result is a lie.

Digital alterations are a step more verboten for pros. As in "due cause for firing". A landmark 1989 case involved removing a Coke can from, ironically, a snap of amateur photographer Ron Olshwanger celebrating in his Pulitzer for spot-news photography. Twenty years later, Microsoft replaced a black man's head with a white one, leaving the darker hand, for a Polish version of its website. Classy. Technologically and culturally.

And yes, both incidents caused as much flap as you might expect.

The tradition of dodgy photos goes back a long way, from "ghost" shots to a Lincoln portrait and even the seminal image of Marines raising the flag at Iwo Jima, as the New York Times points out. From an oil worker with four hands to National Geographic moving a pyramid, folks have used and abused darkroom processes and digital tools. Here ABC recaps the ten worst episodes of image-manipulation.

Attitudes are shifting. As John Long of the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) told ABC: now people "don't look at pictures as though they were historical documents, but as things that they want them to be. It's so easy, it's so pervasive, that the nature of photography has become liquid." Still, professionals fight to maintain standards, especially as DIY publishing and user-generated content threatens the mainstream media's dominance – maybe even its existence... Long, once the ethics co-chair for the NPPA, exhorted his colleagues: "Journalists have only one thing to offer the public and that is CREDIBILITY. Without credibility we have nothing. We might as well go sell widgets door to door since without the trust of the public we cannot exist as a profession."

The blogosphere has yet to develop such cohesion and ethics codes. And perhaps it never will, as much of its charm and strength lies in its Wild West freedoms. So you need to decide where your comfort level lies – and how much of that you want to communicate.

Happily, a simple solution exists for pros and bloggers alike: if you alter an image, label it as an illustration.

Why mislead your readers, when an admission builds trust through transparency?